P5+1 Watching
Iran and the IAEA will hold talks on Monday, their first in three months. IAEA chief inspector Hermann Nackaerts and Iran’s ambassador to IAEA Ali Asghar Soltanieh met in early February on the second of two fruitless IAEA visits to Tehran. Soltanieh has termed the resumption of the talks as proof of Iran’s determination to cooperate with the agency.
The IAEA talks will be closely watched by the P5+1 who will hold their own talks with Iran on 23 May in Baghdad. The West in particular will be looking for any sign of Iran’s serious intention to address IAEA’s alleged evidence of weaponization of its nuclear program.
Iran and the IAEA will hold talks on Monday, their first in three months. IAEA chief inspector Hermann Nackaerts and Iran’s ambassador to IAEA Ali Asghar Soltanieh met in early February on the second of two fruitless IAEA visits to Tehran. Soltanieh has termed the resumption of the talks as proof of Iran’s determination to cooperate with the agency.
The IAEA talks will be closely watched by the P5+1 who will hold their own talks with Iran on 23 May in Baghdad. The West in particular will be looking for any sign of Iran’s serious intention to address IAEA’s alleged evidence of weaponization of its nuclear program.
7 comments:
... and Iran will be looking for signs of sincerity in this round of discussions, with recognition of its nuclear rights provided as a signatory to the NPT.
The problem is the leadership in Tehran is very insincere and leans towards suicidal tendencies.
With such species there can be no reasoning.
Iran on the threshold of nuclear progress.Hard to controll it so west has only option to accept nuclear iran with additional ristrictions.
It must be ensured that regime changes its behaviour or get changed; nothing less than that solves the problem, for many years the regime has refused to auto-correct its behaviour which dragged the country into the dangerous zone; that form of dysfunctionality, which affects and poisons the whole region, can not und will not be tolerated anymore ...
It must be ensured that regime changes its behaviour or get changed; nothing less than that solves the problem, for many years the regime has refused to auto-correct its behaviour which dragged the country into the dangerous zone; that form of dysfunctionality, which affects and poisons the whole region, can not und will not be tolerated anymore ...
You're a fool..People making demands can't be choosers.Iran doesn't lose a damn thing if she doesn't give in to Western pressure.Meanwhile the goal post keeps changing..A few years ago, Iran couldn't produce 20% enriched uranium. Today it's different story. If the West had made a deal back then, there'll be no need for Iran to go ahead with 20% enrichment..If they refuse a settlement in Baghdad this time, Iran will push ahead full steam for 90% enrichment.In fact, Iran doesn't need their permission on anything. They can go f*ck themselves.
It's their economies that's in tatters, not Iran's.
Anon 1:20 PM
That's were you're wrong and Anon 1:58 AM is correct in a certain way.Irans economy is in tatters as well.
Where have you been lately?
Price of bread 30000 rials,meat nearly 50000 rials.
Workers not being paid for months or year or more.Workers being made redundant because of factory closers due to Chinese imports etc etc etc......You live in fantasy land made by Press TV.Iran is paying a very high price by its people because of stupid ultra fanatic policy of the theocracy.
Lets say Iran has 300 nuclear bombs,then what?
Will it put bread on our table?No.
Learn what happened to Soviet Union with a bankrupt economy and 12000 nuclear bombs with the most powerful army in the world.In the end they couldn't sustain it and they collapse.Iran is no exception.
Stop calling people names,it shows your weakness and lack of logic in current affairs.
Anon 1:20 PM......Yeah sure,Iranian economy is booming,you joker.
Post a Comment