IAEA Director Yukiya Amano warned today that the standoff on Iran’s
nuclear program is “worrying.” Amano also stressed that work for a diplomatic
solution should continue.
Amano’s comments came as the IAEA said in a report that Iran was days
away of being able to triple production of 20-percent enriched uranium at its
new Fordo facility.
“The situation is worrying but it is important to continue to seek a
diplomatic solution,” Amano told reporters in Paris after talks with French
President Francois Hollande.
“We are going to have a high-level dialogue with Iran on the 13th of
December in Tehran. The way to solve this issue is by diplomatic means and we
will continue our efforts,” Amano added.
Meanwhile, the Iranian ambassador to Moscow told reporters that Iran was ready to
resume talks with the major powers on the future of its nuclear program but the
West should approach these talks “more constructively.”
“We hope that in the next talks, the six nations - instead of (applying) a double standard, would approach these talks more constructively,” said Reza Sajjadi, Iran’s ambassador, after meeting with Russia’s chief negotiators in the talks.
Iran does not want nor does it need an atomic bomb. Those kind of weapons belong to the past. It won't have any significance to the outcome of an eventual war with the U.S. in the 21st century. It's useless against Israel who has enough nuclear warheads to incinerate every city in Iran upon detection of a missile launch towards Israel. Besides Iran would never risk harming hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, which would inevitably happen if a nuclear strike would impact in Israel.
ReplyDeleteIt is in light of these facts that Iran does not pursue a Nuclear Weapons Program. It can easily be concluded that the allegations and accusations that Iran is currently conducting Nuclear weapon research and that it is trying to manufacture a device which it will weaponize, can easily be exposed as a ghost story with the aim of portraying Iran as the boogeyman.
Underneath this Western campaign lies an agenda for a regime change, even if it requires a ground invasion by Imperialist armed forces, and it might come to that when all of their efforts fail. There has been talk of "boots on the ground" to competly thwart an Iranian attempt at getting the bomb. There has been extensive analysis written by service members of the U.S. military on precisely that point, that an occupation is deemed as the only viable solution to make it impossible for the Iranians to get a nuclear weapon, the exact same case that was made against Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion.
This is whole situation can be summed up as Iraq version 2.0.
It looks like you butchered Mr Amano's given name... lol
ReplyDeleteAnon 8:24 PM
ReplyDeleteThere is going to be no ground invasion of Iran,period.
And as regards the Palestinians the Islamist regime in Tehran is hoping to sacrifice the Iranian nation for the Palestinian cause with their cult ridden agenda.
Now that doesn't necessary mean using nuclear weapons but it means the gradual erosion of Iranian national identity and culture and its replacement with the Palestinian and Iraqi Shiite Muslim Arabian desert verity.
Don't believe it?
Well,over twenty five years ago Rafsanjani said that..."Hopefully within our life time Farsi will be gradually replaced with Arabic language which hopefully will lead to the elimination of pre-Islamic history of Iran."
It is no lie when little fat mullah Khalkhali wanted to bulldoze Apadana and change the name of Persian Gulf to "Islamic Gulf".
To conclude Iran's worst enemy is not the US,Britain or Israel but the Mullahs and their hatred towards Iranian national identity, and their planned replacement of it with pure desert Islam.
Anon 1:00 PM
ReplyDeleteWell,over twenty five years ago Rafsanjani said that..."Hopefully within our life time Farsi will be gradually replaced with Arabic language which hopefully will lead to the elimination of pre-Islamic history of Iran."
I'd like to see the evidence to back up your statement. Or, are you just pulling BS out of thin air?
Anon 10:03 PM
ReplyDeleteHe is pulling BS out of his rectum. This is the same man who opposed Saddam's "Arabization" policy on Iran when he was the commander-in-chief of the Iranian military during the Iran–Iraq War.