Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's foreign minister [ISNA]
BBC Persian reports that Iranian intelligence became aware of "homemade" Sarin making its way to "extremist" rebels in Syria, and that 9 months ago Iran's foreign ministry took the extraordinary step of conveying the intel to the U.S. through the United States Interest Section at the Swiss embassy in Tehran. The claim is made by Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif in an interview with Asman Magazine. Zarif further states the U.S. offered no response to the shared intelligence.
And a parallel claim published at Infowars, H/T Colonel Lang, U.S. Army (Ret.):
ReplyDelete"From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,” writes Gavlak. Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra."
Saudi pimp Bandar is organizing the transfer of chemical weapons to the cannibals as many respected journalists including Mr.Gavlak have been reporting. Saudis also threatened Russia with Takfiri terrorism.
ReplyDeleteMost of the Zionist free media is accurately reporting that the Saudi supported cannibal terrorists who are illiterate and incompetent mishandled the gas delivered to them by Saudi intelligence (an oxymoron):
The blatant lies being told by US government agencies and the mainstream
media over in Syria continue to unravel as a Free Syrian Army Rebel has
come out and admitted to the Associated Press that the rebels were responsible
for the chemical attack in Syria blamed upon Syrian government forces.
If this information isn’t bad enough, the rebels also admit that the
weapons were supplied to them by US ally Saudi Arabia. Is Barack Obama
now going to attack Saudi Arabia and the FSA rebels or will this be
overlooked by the Zionists and the White House and Syria attacked
anyways.
Foreign terrorists in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta have admitted to
Associated Press journalist Dale Gavlak that they were responsible for
last week’s chemical weapons incident which western powers have blamed
on Bashar Al-Assad’s forces, revealing that the casualties were the
result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling chemical weapons
provided to them by Saudi Arabia.
“From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel
fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received
chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin
Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,”writes Gavlak.
Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to handle
the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though
the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot
Jabhat al-Nusra.
“We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the
fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” one
militant named ‘J’ told Gavlak.
His claims are echoed by another female fighter named ‘K’, who told
Gavlak, “They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We
didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were
chemical weapons.”
Will Barack Obama continue to attempt to start WW3 now that this
information has come out and if so, will TPTB and their propaganda
specialists attempt to portray this report as false? Infowars has more
answers to these questions which will show anyone who doubts the
validity of this report only needs to learn who the original source of
this story is, below.
This factual story could completely derail the United States’ rush
to attack Syria which has been founded on the “undeniable”
justification that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack. Dale
Gavlak’s credibility is very impressive. He has been a Middle East
correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR) and written articles for BBC News.
Saudi Arabia’s known role in providing rebels, whom they have
vehemently backed at every turn, with chemical weapons, is no surprise
given the revelations earlier this week that the Saudis threatened
Russia with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi
unless they abandoned support for the Syrian President.
Lang and Infowars are about as honest and reliable as PRESS-TV. they are all pretty much full of shift and quoted by people on that level of honesty and reliability.
ReplyDeleteGavlak also refers to an article in the UK’s Daily Telegraph about secret Russian-Saudi talks stating that Prince Bandar threatened Russian President Vladimir Putin with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if Russia doesn’t agree to change its stance on Syria.
ReplyDelete“Prince Bandar pledged to safeguard Russia’s naval base in Syria if the Assad regime is toppled, but he also hinted at Chechen terrorist attacks on Russia’s Winter Olympics in Sochi if there is no accord,” the article stated.
“I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” Saudi Prince allegedly told Vladimir Putin.
Mint Press News stated that some of the information couldn’t be independently verified and pledged to continue providing updates on this topic.
Voice of Russia might be more credible than US government – Internet users
Recent publication by the Voice of Russia 'Syrian rebels take responsibility for the chemical attack admitting the weapons were provided by Saudis' received a strong outcry among the Internet users as some of them claiming that the company’s reports are more credible than allegations against Syrian government made by US authorities.
‘It's more credible than the US saying we have real evidence of Assad using them [chemical weapons]. Assad doesn't get weapons from Saudi Arabia. They don't have ties. The US will use any reason it can to go to war. Even if it means creating one’, writesDylanJamesCo on Reddit.
Meanwhile, not everyone shares such this point of view.
KoreyYrvaI writes that ‘The Voice of Russia wants us to believe that the Rebels totally were responsible for the chemical attack, and it was an accident… because Russia has been impartial throughout all of this and I don't think America(or anyone) needs another war, but this is hardly credible’.
But one thing unites the users: they believe the US government wants and needs another war in the Middle East.
‘America is just getting better at proxy wars. They have firm ties with the Saudis, and they would have no problem destabilizing Syria if it meant the US could eventually target Iran and its oil reserve’, writes NineteenEightyTwo.
Voice of Russia, Mint Press News
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2013_08_30/Syrian-rebels-take-responsibility-for-the-chemical-attack-admitting-the-weapons-were-provided-by-Saudis-1203/
Voice of Russia might be more credible than US government----
Deletethe US government is not always credible, but Voice of Russia is never reliable. it's a propaganda site owned by the Russian govt., pure and simple.
Iranians lie like they breathe. Just take a look at Mark on here praising iran's economy and society when he knows his greatest fear would be having to leave the us and move to iran.
ReplyDeleteInfowars and quotes from any iranian have zero credibility, rather this propensity for dishonesty is another reason to bomb iran.
Makes a difference from zionists who lie AS EASILY AS they breathe. Quotes from the zionist mainstream media and any zionist have zero credibility. They are the same hypocrites who sold the Iraq war based on a pack of lies.
DeleteThis claim about the Gavlak story is a hoax. Gavlak is an Associated Press reporter. Yet, the AP story is nowhere to be found. This is bullspin by the West-residing Assad Groupies, pure and simple.
ReplyDelete