Archive

Thursday, November 28, 2013

IRIN unveils Asr phased array 'long-range' 3D radar

Iran on Wednesday publicly unveiled its Asr phased array "long-range" 3D radar

Deputy Commander of Artesh Brigadier General Abdolrahim Mousavi and Commander of Iran Navy Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari inspecting Asr related radar console equipment.

Model of navy vessel fitted with Asr rader antennae

Video:

Photos: Amir Pourmand at ISNA, Siamak Ebrahimi at Tasnim News Agency and Mahdi Marizad at FARS News Agency 
Video: IRIB News

16 comments:

  1. MAY the Almighty bless our brothers and sisters in the defense Industries!.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. B.M.A
      Couple months ago, Defense Minister Gen. Dehqan stated that the Iranian industries have to prepare themselves for a design and production of more powerful engines for the Navy,....so we can expect construction of larger vessels in the future, and they will certainly require those shown radars.

      A-F

      P.S.Many replies to you have disappeared in "black holes" of this blog...
      I have red that "Amrika" has an "antiterror" blog......
      It is interesting where is Mat.....and I have nithiced that there are emerging "new" authors with letter from "-A" to............"Z". I wish they will not "run out" of a lack of the alphabet letters.

      Delete
    2. i honestly can not comprehend the flip flop in the western media concerning the IRANIAN MILITARY TOOLS- @ FOR EXAMPLE if you read anything about some new military product announced in Iran,then you read all major papers in the west up to Israel ,they all have the same conclusion-viz-@"Iran regularly announces many breakthroughs in military tools most of which can not be independently verified"!.They are all programmed to write the same thing!-
      -NOW when it comes to the nuclear issue ,this is what they all say-@" Iran has underground reactors built with high sophistication "-@"oh! they are using highly advanced IR2 centrifuges in refining that guarantee them a weapon in a year or a half if they wish!!--"WHY DO THEY praise the Nation when it comes to nuclear technology and independently asses that Iran has two years before making the final dash,but when it comes to missiles and other military tools they flip and say-"Iran regularly announces breakthroughs in military productions but their tools can not be independently verified"-hypocrisy at its best!!

      Delete
  2. No thanks to the criminal mullah regime,Iran is bankrupt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish they could apply aesthetic considerations to their design and manufacturing processes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Classic iranian mentality befitting a pos technology has zero value beyond appearances.

      That's why Israel bombs Lebanon and Syria at will.

      Delete
    2. 'classic Iranian mentality'

      Lebanon and Syria are not Provinces of IRAN! -!. -try something else!

      Delete
    3. So you're admitting that the zionist occupation is a terrorist regime.

      Delete
    4. And that's why, by contrast, it doesn't bomb Iran. And so, despite claiming it can do so since 2003 on a monthly basis, and more recently, on a daily one. Lebanon has no air defenses to speak of. Syria has mostly outdated, semi-refurbished hardware like SA-6s that western forces can easily jam since the mid-80s, and still, IDF planes bomb via Lebanese airspace with stand-off munitions, far from Syrian air defense zones. If Iran were to do the same against any country, you would probably call them "cowards who can't face the enemy". But your "pos" signature word reminds me of some random guy who got his pseudo-argumentation against Iran's military pounded by every other informed participant on this blog every time he tried to spit it out on other pages, so I guess going against your latest horse shit of a post would be pointless this time around. Zero value huh, like when they made a cutting-edge stealth RQ-170 land safely on an Iranian base by making it believe it was its home base. Or when an Iranian drone operated for more than two hours over strategic areas of Israel including the surroundings of the Dimona reactor, and when it took two attempts by IDF F-16s to shoot it down, a story that ended with the dismissal of the local Israeli chief in charge of surveillance operations and the admission by the Israelis that it had some "special attributes that made it difficult to lock on". "pos" history indeed. And Israel doesn't bomb Iran out of kindness and wise restraint too, I guess.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous 1:55 AM

      Those Iranian terrorists that are occupying your country will get their sorry asses spanked red hot just like the other Arab militaries when they went to war against tiny but mighty Israel. Iran will be set free one fine day. I can garantuee that.

      Delete
    6. "other Arab militaries"?! Really? That pretty much removes any credibility you may have had. Here's a free bit of advice. Iran is not an Arab country. Not literally and not militarily.

      Delete
    7. LoL yeah, anyone still making such a parallel inherently betrays the ideological nature of his position towards the country rather than any objective kind of thinking supported by solid facts. No rationale, no arguments, just worn-out broken records all the way, insulting any iranian achievement in the process being a natural part of it, no matter the regime in place.

      Delete
    8. AnonymousNovember 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM
      AnonymousNovember 30, 2013 at 11:04 AM
      Agreed

      Delete
  4. There's nothing this regime and its henchmen can do to avoid complete annihilation at the hands of the USA. A bit of upgrade over here and alittle bit of improvement over there won't do any difference in the scheme of things.

    Now as usual a fool will pop-up to desperately try to denounce this reality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous November 29, 2013 at 10:26 AM
      If thats the case then why did the us sit down and agree a deal with iran that ran counter to all its stated goals for the last decade?,why didnt it just attack if its so powerful and iran so weak?,because a war with iran would be long and costly with global effects and a very uncertain outcome,attacking iran would be far more difficult than attacking iraq or afghanistan or libya

      Delete
    2. Actually a recent study put the projected war costs to a lot more than the Iraqi & Afgan campaigns combined, would it be only in financial terms, let alone physical destruction of their interests in the region and the subsequent human casualties. Two relevant articles :

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-strikes-on-iran-would-risk-all-out-middle-east-war-experts/
      http://thediplomat.com/2012/01/five-reasons-not-to-attack-iran/ ==> From member of the faculty at the U.S. Air Force's Air University, definitly NOT your usual IRI fanboy doing nothing but cheap propaganda, I think...

      Delete